Evolution is by its very nature the
constant change of something. Language
is no different, and in the new age dominated by computers and the internet,
language is changing faster than ever before.
Yet, the broad changes in the English language, ushered in by the
emergence of new outlets for the written word, have been dubbed by some a
devolution. In reality the English
language has just entered a new era.
Foremost it is important to note something about the English language, it
is and has been used in a number of different ways.
First, the English language has
been used to express very basic things.
Take for example a greeting, “hello, how are you?” this statement would
be considered by critics of modern changes to language, a proper greeting,
whereas a more modern form for example “What’s up?” would be considered
devolved. However, it is important to
view the context of both of these statements, not in terms of conversation, but
technology. In the former example, there
are four words and five syllables, in the latter there are two words two
syllables. In other words the latter
statement is more streamlined, which is a case similar to most shorthand used
in texting or other means of basic communication. This simplification has mirrored a change in
how streamlined communication has become.
With the increasing rate with which people can transfer information,
there becomes a response in the English language, where there become quicker
ways to express the same meaning, by removing excess verbiage. Between quicker transfers, and shorter
writing there is room for what will be referred to as, informal unnecessary
updates. These informal unnecessary
updates, are instances where someone will, for example, declare how much they
enjoy the food they are eating with something like, “OMG this is gr8”. To most people this would register as a
devolution of language, as the words written and then distributed by text,
social media, or other method, have little meaning. To that response, it is important to note
that statements like the one mentioned above, are nothing new to the English
language. The only change is that the
medium, and number of people it will reach.
In prior eras it was equally likely for someone to exclaim their
enjoyment of food, however the number of people reached by these words has
extended from the people sitting around the table, to anyone with access to,
the most modern of mediums, the internet.
In short informal language is evolving with technology, becoming more
like short hand, however what is being expressed hasn’t changed in content only
in medium.
Second, formal language has also
seen changes to its usage. To critics of
modern day changes to language, the main problems that they find are in the
aforementioned informal unnecessary updates, and they pay little attention to
formal language. In formal language
evolution has also taken place. The
creation of the internet has made the publishing of intellectual papers easier
to access. In reaction these papers have
become more simplistic in their wording, to reach a broader audience. However simple is not necessarily a bad
thing, as certain thinkers including George Orwell had explained, there was an
inherent problem with formal papers in the not too distant past, that problem
being that it was to excessive in verbiage.
In some instances words with little meaning or purpose to a sentence
would be added in order to make the statement seem more intellectual or
complex, luckily these extra words are being combated by the evolution of the
internet as a medium, and the resulting desire to cut excessive complexity and
verbiage to make it more accessible to the common person.
In conclusion, although these
changes to language don’t seem gr8 at first, they are just another step in the
endless evolution of the English language, ushered in by a new medium, and characterized
by streamlined communication.
You make a persuasive case, but I'm not one hundred percent convinced that "itz gr8" does not at least on some level represent a loss of precision in language. I was just writing about Orwell's 1984 over on Mumtaz's blog--in which he makes the point that when we lose words we lost the ability to think about the ideas those words represent...
ReplyDeleteInteresting how the line between evolution and devolution is so thin, often dependent on the context or medium of the message rather than the message itself
ReplyDelete