Plato
was not only a philosopher but a political theorist as well. His ideal government was one where “the state
should be governed by philosophers” (Gaarder 91). His theory was presented in ancient Greece,
since then there have been many governments classified by the name
republic. The most notable republic may
well be the United States, founded by well-educated philosophers, including Benjamin
Franklin and Thomas Jefferson. Since
then however there appears to have been a shift in how American government
functions. Niel Postman explains that “the
fundamental metaphor for political discourse is a television commercial”
(Postman 126). This description of the
modern American republic is in sharp contrast to Plato’s intended style of
government.
These
differences between modern American attitudes and the thoughts of Plato are
also distinct in our style of news.
Plato was one of the most notable students of Socrates, and was heavily
influenced by Socrates practice of asking questions and feigning
ignorance. In contrast the American
approach is largely to never ask questions, and be ignorant. This approach is personified in television
news, or perhaps more accurately television newsertainment. This newsertainment breaks the meaningful dialogue
people can pursue as Postman explains,
“There is no murder so
brutal, no earthquake so devastating, no political blunder so costly—for that
matter, no ball score so tantalizing or weather report so threatening—that it
cannot be erased from our minds by a newscaster saying, ‘Now . . . this’”
(Postman 99).
Effectively when a newscaster says “now this” the flow
of information is ended, and any thought, question or view that a listener
might have begun to formulate is likely terminated. The now this phenomena has also killed
another aspect of the Socratic system of dialogue using rational thought. The death to rational thought comes about in
response to the shorter news segments, that give only partial information with
little context, thus making it impossible to truly make any rational
conclusions. In short if Plato could see
today he may very well gravitate towards a similar view as that posited by Niel
Postman.
Works Cited
Postman, Niel. Amusing
ourselves to death Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business. New York: Penguin Group, 2006. Print.
Gaarder, Jostein. Sophie’s
World. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2007. Print
No comments:
Post a Comment