The Godfather, often considered one of history’s greatest
movies, with a complex but elegant plot it serves as a true showing of
impressive story structure. In contrast Saturday
Night Live may well be among the causes of the destruction of quality
narratives. NBC’s Saturday Night Live
has, to its credit, been a springboard for comedic careers since its inception
in 1975, but perhaps its most impressive legacy is the popularization of sketch
based comedy through the medium of television.
The idea of sketch based comedy is the antithesis of narrative story
arcs, with most sketches being brief jabs at aspects of society. It is this lack of continuity in story and
narrative that that Rushkoff posits, has caused “television to lose its ability
to tell stories over time” (Rushkoff 22).
Among the more popular of sketch comedy series in the modern era are South
Park, Family guy, and Key and Peele, all of which have done some degree of harm
to the narrative traditions of movies like the Godfather.
Both
Family Guy and South Park represent a half hour (commercials included) of
content, with a story. But the important
thing to note is that the episodes are largely contained, with each one having
a relatively limited story arc. The typical episode will contain a heavily
condensed and simplified version of the hero’s journey, but will run very
quickly through the individual parts and at points somewhat or entirely
disregarding the journey to interject a cultural reference of negligible
importance to what plot may exist.
Though it is still important to note, as it will be contrasted to later,
the fact that there is a continuity in the way characters are portrayed, as
they maintain the same physical and character traits. This sort of construction, with a haphazard creation
of background to the story creates what Rushkoff refers to as “something more
like putting together a puzzle by making connections and recognizing patterns”
than an actual narrative system (34).
Though
even this sort of partial narrative is more than exists in a true sketch comedy
like Key and Peele. This Comedy Central
show saw a massive degree of success both critically and commercially. The show however was still entirely sketch
based. Sketches could be five minutes
long, or just over a minute. In a sketch
with only one minute of story there was almost no room to create any sort of arc.
The steps of a hero’s journey are almost entirely eliminated, and substituted
by the minimum aspects required for people to understand or laugh at
jokes. Background, and setting have to
be judged by the audience member in the fractions of seconds before the dialogue
starts off. In the next few seconds the
audience must quickly evaluate the characters who begin to talk, who the
characters may be satirizing, and what relationship they may have to each
other. And so on with every few seconds
the audience having to switch mental focus.
That in and of itself yields weight to the fixation on presentism, as
all parts are rapid fire, giving little time for the audience’s minds to access
the broader implications of the sketch.
But the other aspect of sketch shows that further reinforces presentism
is the episode structure. There is not
one sketch per episode. There is not a
consistent set of characters. There is
often not a single aspect shared between one sketch and the next. This type of episode structure is in sharp
contrast to the way in which South Park, or Family Guy would function. With this sort of self contained sketches
rather than just self contained episodes, the problems posed by Family Guy and
South Park like shows are only magnified by the condensed time format.
To
conclude, the ability to convey narratives and stories is under assault. With ever more condensed and presentist shows
taking more of the public’s attention it seems that stories and shows with
defined beginnings middles and ends are becoming less and less important. With that it seems clear that our culture has
become all the more susceptible to Present Shock.
Rushkoff, Douglass. Present
Shock: When Everything Happens Now. New York: Penguin, 2013. Print.
I like how you have included multiple examples. Showing how multiple shows have abandoned the traditional narrative and express what Rushknoff said in Present Shock. If you also included information about how fantasy gaming reflects Rushknoffs ideas and maybe shows that reflect fantasy gaming, it would add an extra layer on analysis and information to your post.
ReplyDeleteThe idea of present shock obviously comes from Douglas Rushkoff, but your discussion of sketches reminded me of Amusing Ourselves to Death. Neil Postman argues that the television has made our discourse irrational. The idea of the collapsing narrative and irrational discourse compliment each other nicely when discussing comedic sketches. The sketches like the ones of Key and Peele, South Park, and Family Guy are pure silliness and irrationality. The sketches/shows are meant only to entertain, not to provide a thrilling narrative like the plot of any decent novel. Although the examples you discussed are great examples of present shock, Neil Postman's ideas can be applied to them as well.
ReplyDeleteYou make some very good points about some of these programs as evidence of narrative collapse. I'm not sure about comparing "The Godfather" and "Saturday Night Live" though--perhaps this is apples and oranges...or Volkswagens. Sketch shows have been popular for many decades--probably dating to the era of vaudeville. They never attempted the sort of complex storytelling in the tragic hero mold of "The Godfather." These two may simply be the modern incarnations of two fairly separate, older traditions.
ReplyDelete